Fi vs . Rattan Lal Etc. Page 1 Of 14 on 6 January, 2014
cash
memo. It must be remembered that it is not a document drafted by a
solicitor, it is document using the language of a tradesman
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 188 (1.43 seconds)Cbi vs . Bani Singh on 9 January, 2014
Lacs of which he had received Rs.
2.30 Lacs by draft. The documents executed regarding the sale were
Kalpesh H Thakker vs State Of Gujarat & 4 on 11 April, 2014
draft
amendment moved by the petitioner.
Page 6 of 24
R/SCR.A/3289/2013 CAV JUDGMENT
5.5 On record various documents have been produced
Nirbhay Kumar, The Then Dy. Sp Cbi vs Wing Cdr. (Rtd) Yashvir Singh Tomar on 30 August, 2014
Confidential' and 'Secret' documents from the residence of accused.
Documents allegedly recovered from residence of accused were sent to
PW2 for opinion ... respect of Folder 7 (G20G72) of description draft contract for shipping,
detailed as unsigned draft contract for shipping to Embarkation HQ
Mumbai whose source
Sh. Mohd. Rashid Noor vs Mohd. Zafar Noor on 9 September, 2014
relied upon the following
documents document:
i) Photo copy of agreement dt. 241178 is Mark A.
ii) Demand draft ... Manmohan proved the documents Ex. PW1/2 and Ex.
PW4/1.
22. PW5 Sh. Alok Kumar proved the documents
Shri D. N. Talwar vs Shri Atul Duggal on 30 July, 2014
draft directly in the name of the seller, the
official of the bank informed them and the plaintiff that as per the title
documents shown ... wife of the plaintiff, the sale
documents have to be executed by her only and the draft/cheque shall
be prepared in her name only
Bypl vs . Amar Singh on 10 March, 2014
Preetam Singh at the spot for seizing
the case property. All the documents were prepared at the spot and
offered to the representative ... raid.
He inspire the knowledge about the complaint from the documents.
Complaint is not drafted in his presence.
PW 2 admitted that he received
Cc No 106/1/04 Pawan Kumar Jaju vs . Tarakant Jha Page 1 Of 10 on 22 May, 2014
deferred for production of such documents. On 02.02.2013 CW-1 produced
photocopy of three demand drafts drawn in favour of Seimens Video Automatic Ltd.,
Executive ... provide proof of the cash amount given to the
accused but no document was produced by the CW1 complainant to prove the
allegations. He stated
Cc No 106/1/04 Pawan Kumar Jaju vs . Tarakant Jha Page 1 Of 10 on 22 May, 2014
deferred for production of such documents. On 02.02.2013 CW-1 produced
photocopy of three demand drafts drawn in favour of Seimens Video Automatic Ltd.,
Executive ... provide proof of the cash amount given to the
accused but no document was produced by the CW1 complainant to prove the
allegations. He stated
Sh. Sushil Mishra vs Sh. Satender Pal Sharma on 11 March, 2014
that in complaint CC no. 2024/2010 Document Ex. CW1/A4
dated 31.01.2010 was drafted and sent by him on behalf ... dated 24.07.2010 is copy of a legal notice
drafted and sent by him on behalf of one Mr. S.N. Pandey to Mr.
Satender