deferred for production of such documents. On 02.02.2013 CW-1 produced
photocopy of three demand drafts drawn in favour of Seimens Video Automatic Ltd.,
Executive ... provide proof of the cash amount given to the
accused but no document was produced by the CW1 complainant to prove the
allegations. He stated
deferred for production of such documents. On 02.02.2013 CW-1 produced
photocopy of three demand drafts drawn in favour of Seimens Video Automatic Ltd.,
Executive ... provide proof of the cash amount given to the
accused but no document was produced by the CW1 complainant to prove the
allegations. He stated
2021/2010 Document Ex. CW1/A4
CC No. 2021/10 page no. 6 /14
dated 25.01.2010 was drafted and sent ... dated 24.07.2010 is copy of a legal notice
drafted and sent by him on behalf of one Mr. S.N. Pandey to Mr.
Satender
that in complaint CC no. 2024/2010 Document Ex. CW1/A4
dated 31.01.2010 was drafted and sent by him on behalf ... dated 24.07.2010 is copy of a legal notice
drafted and sent by him on behalf of one Mr. S.N. Pandey to Mr.
Satender
paid by him by two demand drafts and the last
demand draft cleared the entire outstanding of the accused towards the
complainant ... amount in question and as per the document DW 1/B, the subsequent payment
made by draft dated 12.12.2007 was towards the outstanding liability
Predecessor on 17.09.2013, for filing the
additional documents. Same was allowed and the following
additional documents were filed :
● Copy of receipt dated ... signed by
the complainant alongwith other document as the accused used to
sign many documents through the complainant out of mutual trust
because the complainant
reliance can be placed on
fax Ex. DW1/A, that no document for grant of loan of Rs. 50,90,400/
was executed, that ... amount shown in the balance sheet is in
total of four drafts, that no suggestion was given to CW 1 in cross
examination regarding
time of
execution of sale deed / transfer documents. Affidavit Ex.CW1/24 and
Ex.CW1/26 of the accused further lend corroboration ... relations with complainant - respondent.
She further stated to have issued the demand draft / pay order in the name of
MCD, but she could not tell
evidence by way of affidavit Ex.CW1/A and relied upon documents
Ex.CW1/1 to Ex. CW1/7. Thereafter ... Ashwani Kumar from
Punjab and Sind Bank who produced the documents Ex.PW2/1 and Ex.PW2/2.
Thereafter, CW2 was cross examined
which otherwise also does not even finds
mention in any of the documents brought on record as part of complainant evidence in
this case.
13. Furthermore ... accused herein) against payment in cash or by demand draft and that the
corporation may in its sole discretion agree to give such credit facilities
