agreed to pay the commission to the plaintiff no.
1 after the documents of transfer are registered.
Sh. Ramesh Kumar Rajpal Vs. Sh. Rakesh Kumar ... that both the defendants thereafter desired that they
would get necessary documents drafted though their own legal advisers and they
would inform the plaintiff
proved the following documents :
•Seizure memo Ex.PW3/A vide which the documents were handed over to
CBI officials.
•Demand draft no. 020962 dated ... India, Daryaganj branch in 1991 proved the following
documents :
•Credit voucher dated 31.10.91 for issuing the draft by Modern
Engineering and Fabricators
suggestion that none of the parties
had requested him to draft all the documents or that none of them
more particularly plaintiff was known ... also not kept any record regarding the
drafting of the said documents. However, it was admitted by him
that the possession of the suit property
over application, so drafted to Ashok Kumar. The witness
explained that the application so drafted, was hand written. He was
shown document D15 and questioned ... same as of the application
drafted by him. Thereupon, the witness stated that contents of
document D15 are exactly not the same which were prepared
that Kewal
Krishan along with the defendant came to him for drafting
the document. He stated that he had signed below the
witnesses ... would sign first and last page of a
document without reading the said document. She has not
explained as to why she had purchased
Surya
Kant Singla, Advocate at Delhi High Court, New Delhi who drafted the papers
such as surrender deed, letter to SHO, P.S. Tilak Marg ... where stipulates that these documents were drafted by Sh. Surya
Kant Singla advocate. In these circumstances Sh. Surya Kant Singla advocate
who stated to have
favour by the holder and accused used the said forged
documents forged Bank draft as a genuine and thereby accused
committed an offence punishable ... were
inserted by Bhambhri Financers into the demand drafts and the same
were bounced alongwith demand drafts.
11. PW8 is Inspector Vineet Soni who deposed
Sadar Bazar Branch, Delhi06, by way of a Demand Draft.
This document has not been challenged by the defendant side. Though,
the defendant
towards the agreement. I have not
produced or placed on record any document to
show that I have balance amount ... same vicinity. I was present at the time of drafting
of document Ex.PW1/1. I have no knowledge if the
plaintiff has made
other
document which goes to prove my stand that consultation
receipts means brokerage..."
"...It is correct that document ... bears my signature and the same is self
drafted. The document Ex. PW1/D7 is my letter pad and
was got printed