immediately after the alleged execution of the draft sale deed. She has not
produced any document to show that she is in possession ... that the document was drafted with ulterior motives to fraudulently acquire the
property from the defendants, who are illiterate and incapable of
understanding the situation
itself, the 1st
defendant handed over the xerox copies of parent document and also
delivered the possession of suit property as part performance of contract ... sale deeds. As per the evidence of P.W.2, he drafted the
document at the instance of both plaintiff and 1st defendant
itself, the 1st
defendant handed over the xerox copies of parent document and also
delivered the possession of suit property as part performance of contract ... sale deeds. As per the evidence of P.W.2, he drafted the
document at the instance of both plaintiff and 1st defendant
itself, the 1st
defendant handed over the xerox copies of parent document and also
delivered the possession of suit property as part performance of contract ... sale deeds. As per the evidence of P.W.2, he drafted the
document at the instance of both plaintiff and 1st defendant
insertion. Normally any
insertion made in the document, it should be mentioned in the end of the
document by whom it was written ... Will it is mentioned
that drafted and attested by the document writer Shanmugam. Draft of the
Will is totally different from type written
insertion. Normally any
insertion made in the document, it should be mentioned in the end of the
document by whom it was written ... Will it is mentioned
that drafted and attested by the document writer Shanmugam. Draft of the
Will is totally different from type written
Attorney was drafted at the instigation of PW1 at
his Advocate office. After completion of drafting, the witnesses to the
document appeared, signed and affixed ... Attorney are different. Preponderance of probability that PW1
might have drafted the document with connivance the Advocate who
conducted his case before the Trial Court
cross examination of P.W.1, he admits that
said document was drafted at his instance with the help of his agent but the
said ... that plaintiff was ready on 16.08.2005 with
alleged draft sale deed but he has not drafted sale deed for the agreed sale
consideration
cross examination of P.W.1, he admits that
said document was drafted at his instance with the help of his agent but the
said ... that plaintiff was ready on 16.08.2005 with
alleged draft sale deed but he has not drafted sale deed for the agreed sale
consideration
advocate
by profession, he is entitled to draft the sale deed by relying the documents,
which were placed before him. Accordingly, he drafted the sale ... actively participated with an
intention to create a false document at the time of drafting the sale deed. When
there is no prima facie materials
