Ghanashyam Mishra And Sons Private ... vs Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction ... on 13 April, 2021
Ghanashyam Mishra And Sons Private ... vs Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction ... on 13 April, 2021
Equivalent citations
Search Results Page
Search Results
21 - 30 of 39386 (0.49 seconds)Nathi Devi vs Radha Devi Gupta on 17 December, 2004
will not be accepted except for compelling reasons such as obvious drafting
errors. (See State of U.P. and others vs. Vijay Anand Maharaj
State Of Bihar & Ors. Etc. Etc vs Bihar Distillery Ltd. Etc. Etc on 3 December, 1996
search for
defects of drafting, much less inexactitude of language
employed. Indeed, any such defects of drafting should be
ironed out as part ... this result has been arrived at by pointing out some
drafting errors and some imperfection in the language
employed. If only the High Court
M/S Adarsh Stone Company (Crusher) vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 28 February, 2020
will
not be accepted except for compelling reasons such as obvious drafting errors.
(See State of U.P. and others vs. Vijay Anand Maharaj
Section 22 in Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 [Entire Act]
omission of the word 'and' here is probably a drafting error] unless the dealer affected has had a reasonable opportunity of showing cause against such
Vora Abbasbhai Alimahomed vs Haji Gulamnabi Haji Safibhai on 22 October, 1963
that is a mere
drafting error.) Section 11 authorises the Court to fix
standard rent on an
165
application made for that purpose
Rojer Mathew vs South Indian Bank Ltd And Ors Chief ... on 13 November, 2019
Rojer Mathew vs South Indian Bank Ltd And Ors Chief ... on 13 November, 2019
Equivalent
Vikram Ispat And Ors. vs Cce on 22 July, 1999
Vikram Ispat And Ors. vs Cce on 22 July, 1999
Equivalent citations: 2000(88)ECR327
Varsha Kapoor vs Uoi & Ors. on 3 June, 2010
interpretation
of statutes that the Court is obliged to correct obvious
drafting errors and adopt the constructive role of 'finding the
intention of Parliament
Star India P. Ltd. vs The Telecom Regulatory Authority Of ... on 9 July, 2007
interpretation of statutes that the Court is obliged to correct obvious drafting errors and adopt the constructive role of 'finding the intention of Parliament ... opinion that far from being clumsy or awkward drafting, as contended by learned Counsel for the Petitioners, the definition in Section