Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

additional urea from the Marketing Organization. Hence, the trial Court committed grave error in acquitting the respondent. Other material prosecution witnesses have also supported ... against him that he made some interpolations in Release Order and Demand Draft. For the purpose of proving those interpolations, prosecution did not examine

Sudhir Kumar Bhalla vs Jagdish Chand, Etc. Etc on 1 May, 2008 Equivalent citations: AIR

lieu of the same, had handed over to him the forged demand draft of an amount of ::: Downloaded on - 15/04/2017 ... appreciation of evidence. The High Court in revision cannot absence or error on a point of law, re-appreciate ::: Downloaded on - 15/04/2017

6.1998. Ld. Counsel Further Argued That ... vs Union Of India (1988) 1 Scc on 1

Cbi vs Smt. Rita Singh on 27 August, 2022 IN THE COURT OF SH. VINAY