that it was intended
to correct the typographical mistake and error occurred, while
drafting the complaint. Learned advocate submitted that it was a
curable infirmity
accused",
It is submitted that it was a typographical error. The application was
drafted during Covid period. It was a bona fide mistake
placed on record
on behalf of respondent. Ld. Trial Court committed an error in holding
otherwise in the impugned judgment dated 03.12.2021. With these
observations ... Section 437 (A) CrPC.
Bond has not been furnished. The demand draft amounting to 20% of the
compensation amount deposited with Ld. Trial Court
M/S Mittal Trading Company vs Munish Kumar Gupta on 4 January, 2023
CRM-M
Harikisan Vithaldasji Chandak And 3 ... vs Syed Mazaruddin Syed Shabuddin (D) Thr. ... on 28 April
Propertymen Realty Pvt. Ltd vs The State Of Jharkhand & Ors on 14 September, 2023
Ramdeobaba Developers And Builders ... vs Syed Mazaruddin Syed Shabuddin (D) Thr. ... on 28 April, 2023
Harikisan Vithaldasji Chandak And 3 ... vs Syed Mazaruddin Syed Shabuddin (D) Thr. ... on 28 April
Ramdeobaba Developers And Builders ... vs Syed Mazaruddin Syed Shabuddin (D) Thr. ... on 28 April, 2023
Amitabha Sengupta vs Sri Atanu Banik on 30 August, 2023
Author: T. Amarnath Goud
Bench
