Vinod Kumar Singh vs Distt. Basic Education Officer & ... on 30 November, 2010
will not be accepted except for compelling reasons such as obvious drafting errors. (See State of U.P. and others vs. Vijay Anand Maharaj
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 350 (1.25 seconds)Arun Kumar Chaturvedi vs The State Of U.P. And Others on 30 April, 2013
will not be accepted except for compelling reasons such as obvious drafting errors.
So far as the judgment relied by learned counsel for the petitioner
Commissioner, Customs & Central ... vs M/S Eco Products (India) Pvt. Ltd. on 6 July, 2012
could be prepared on 29th July, 2005 and two copies of the drafted appeal were sent to the appellant for effecting service on the respondent ... bonafide and the delay was due to error and mistakes which took place in finalising the draft and it cannot be said that the appellant
State Of Goa vs Narayan V. Gaonkar . on 4 March, 2020
time read aloud
in the presence of the persons assembled,
the draft of the Index of Lands for the
village. He shall then inform them ... that effect
in the remarks column of the draft. If in
respect of any entry any error is pointed
out and is admitted
Vinod Kumar Agrawal vs State Of U.P. & Ors. on 1 July, 2010
advertisement dated 22nd April, 2007 and had also submitted a bank draft of
Rs.4,60,000/- which was got received ... given up, the petitioner's
bank draft was rightly returned. We do not see any error in the order dated
19th February
Pankaj Dayaprasad Tiwari &Anr vs Sunil Gajanan Nanal & Anr on 22 March, 2024
view that
Adjudicating Authority committed error in not accepting the Bank Draft of
Rs.75 lakhs shown to the Court on the date when ... Adjudicating Authority ought to have given an opportunity to deposit
the Bank Draft to complete the payment of Rs.1 crore as was directed
Pankaj Dayaprasad Tiwari &Anr vs Sunil Gajanan Nanal & Anr on 22 March, 2024
view that
Adjudicating Authority committed error in not accepting the Bank Draft of
Rs.75 lakhs shown to the Court on the date when ... Adjudicating Authority ought to have given an opportunity to deposit
the Bank Draft to complete the payment of Rs.1 crore as was directed
Pankaj Dayaprasad Tiwari &Anr vs Sunil Gajanan Nanal & Anr on 22 March, 2024
view that
Adjudicating Authority committed error in not accepting the Bank Draft of
Rs.75 lakhs shown to the Court on the date when ... Adjudicating Authority ought to have given an opportunity to deposit
the Bank Draft to complete the payment of Rs.1 crore as was directed
Beacon Trusteeship Limited vs Jayesh Sanghrajka on 27 May, 2024
Rupees Twenty-
Five Crores) as per the terms and condition of the draft
RFRP. The performance security provided by the
resolution applicant to be returned ... have
observed some referencing errors in the drat RFRP and
the same will be emailed separately to incorporate in
the draft RFRP.
Copy
Icici Prudential Venture Capital Fund ... vs Mr. Jayesh Sanghrajka & Ors on 27 May, 2024
Rupees Twenty-
Five Crores) as per the terms and condition of the draft
RFRP. The performance security provided by the
resolution applicant to be returned ... have
observed some referencing errors in the drat RFRP and
the same will be emailed separately to incorporate in
the draft RFRP.
Copy