every room to believe that under the pretext of preparing draft
development plan, the draft prepared by respondent No. 4 is to be altered
there ... draft prepared earlier which have been reduced in
the draft prepared by respondent No. 6 to 171. There are several such
objections to the draft
every room to believe that under the pretext of preparing draft
development plan, the draft prepared by respondent No. 4 is to be altered
there ... draft prepared earlier which have been reduced in
the draft prepared by respondent No. 6 to 171. There are several such
objections to the draft
every room to believe that under the pretext of preparing draft
development plan, the draft prepared by respondent No. 4 is to be altered
there ... draft prepared earlier which have been reduced in
the draft prepared by respondent No. 6 to 171. There are several such
objections to the draft
every room to believe that under the pretext of preparing draft
development plan, the draft prepared by respondent No. 4 is to be altered
there ... draft prepared earlier which have been reduced in
the draft prepared by respondent No. 6 to 171. There are several such
objections to the draft
every room to believe that under the pretext of preparing draft
development plan, the draft prepared by respondent No. 4 is to be altered
there ... draft prepared earlier which have been reduced in
the draft prepared by respondent No. 6 to 171. There are several such
objections to the draft
self-same advocate has drafted this application for condonation of delay on
his behalf, such factual error cannot be attributed to the petitioner ... title of each of the application separately, the error seems to
have percolated while drafting the present petition as well. The other three
complainants whose
would submit that there could be some error and it would be a matter of
ill-drafting but one could easily gather that the facts ... grant appropriate relief.
9. Learned A.P.P. submits that no error can be found with the observations
and conclusions by the learned Judge
petition.
7. The learned Advocate Mr. Golewar submitted that there was no error,
irregularity or infirmity in the Scheme that was approved under Section ... that form and neither Pandharinath having raised any objection
to the draft Scheme, by Mutation Entry No. 118, name of Pandharinath was
mutated only
that
no objection was raised within the time prescribed after publication of draft
modification which was accordingly finalized by following all the necessary ... under Section 247 of the Maharashtra Land
Revenue Code and realising the error in invoking the remedy, had preferred
the Revision under Section
that
no objection was raised within the time prescribed after publication of draft
modification which was accordingly finalized by following all the necessary ... under Section 247 of the Maharashtra Land
Revenue Code and realising the error in invoking the remedy, had preferred
the Revision under Section
