M/S Sureshchandra Dhulabhai Patel vs Secretary, Industries And Mines ... on 30 November, 2023
M/S Sureshchandra Dhulabhai Patel vs Secretary, Industries And Mines ... on 30 November, 2023
Author
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 2293 (1.82 seconds)Yogashram Cooperative Housing Society ... vs Ashish Kiritkumar Purani on 4 August, 2023
Yogashram Cooperative Housing Society ... vs Ashish Kiritkumar Purani on 4 August, 2023
Author: Bhargav D
Contemporary Targett Praful P. Ltd. vs Jewel Brushes Pvt. Ltd. on 22 April, 1999
annulled, they cannot be amended in either House.... so that errors in language, if detected, cannot be corrected. There are, of course, no three readings ... inconsistency with its manifest intentions [.......] It has to be accepted that drafting errors frequently occur [......] This has always been so; and there is nothing
Nirmal Jagmohan Sharma vs High Court Of Gujarat on 18 April, 2023
will not be accepted except
for compelling reasons such as obvious drafting errors.
13 It is well settled that literal interpretation should be given
Sudhir Kumar Sharma vs State Of Gujarat on 23 September, 2025
been arrayed as an accused for an alleged
printing error in Demand Draft No. 320438, it has been canvassed
on behalf of the petitioner that ... procured a demand draft of the said amount on 20.01.2021 vide
Demand Draft No. 320438. However, upon presentation, the said
demand draft was dishonoured with
Chhitubhai vs Chandubhai on 28 August, 2008
will not be accepted except for compelling reasons such
as obvious drafting errors. (See, Constitution Bench decision of the
Supreme Court in the case
Dodsal vs State on 18 January, 2010
submitted that it can
be said to be an error in drafting the application to condone the
delay. However, the same cannot be accepted. Unless ... explaining the delay, it
cannot be said that it is an error in drafting the application. If
the petitioner wanted to condone the huge delay
Salman Raje vs Madhavsang Banesang And Ors. on 6 February, 1963
that manner and further observed that there was some laxity in the drafting of the section and that that was clear from the fact that ... learned Judges because they thought the Legislature had committed an error while drafting Section 2A and that that supposed error was subsequently repaired
Maharaja Sayajirao University vs Ram Mangaram Mirchandani on 7 August, 2001
fact, passed by the Syndicate and there was an error in drafting the said order by the Registrar, who is merely a communicating authority
Shankerbhai C. Baria vs State Of Gujarat And Ors. on 5 March, 1992
occurring therein appears to be an apparent error on the part of the draftsman while drafting the Amending Act . According to Shri Ajmera, the correct ... necessary to come to the conclusion that there is any error in drafting the Amending Act for amendment of Order 33 Rule