Indore Development Authority vs Shailendra (Dead) Through Its Lrs. And ... on 8 February, 2018
Indore Development Authority vs Shailendra (Dead) Through Its Lrs. And ... on 8 February, 2018
Equivalent
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 1640 (2.03 seconds)M. R. Balaji And Others vs State Of Mysore on 28 September, 1962
State conceded before the High Court that there was a
drafting error in the Government Order and so, it did not
press its case that
Ghanashyam Mishra And Sons Private ... vs Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction ... on 13 April, 2021
Ghanashyam Mishra And Sons Private ... vs Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction ... on 13 April, 2021
Equivalent citations
Nathi Devi vs Radha Devi Gupta on 17 December, 2004
will not be accepted except for compelling reasons such as obvious drafting
errors. (See State of U.P. and others vs. Vijay Anand Maharaj
State Of Bihar & Ors. Etc. Etc vs Bihar Distillery Ltd. Etc. Etc on 3 December, 1996
search for
defects of drafting, much less inexactitude of language
employed. Indeed, any such defects of drafting should be
ironed out as part ... this result has been arrived at by pointing out some
drafting errors and some imperfection in the language
employed. If only the High Court
Vora Abbasbhai Alimahomed vs Haji Gulamnabi Haji Safibhai on 22 October, 1963
that is a mere
drafting error.) Section 11 authorises the Court to fix
standard rent on an
165
application made for that purpose
Rojer Mathew vs South Indian Bank Ltd And Ors Chief ... on 13 November, 2019
Rojer Mathew vs South Indian Bank Ltd And Ors Chief ... on 13 November, 2019
Equivalent
Manga @ Man Singh vs State Of Uttarkakhand on 3 May, 2013
rule
In discharging its interpretative function, the Court can
correct obvious drafting errors and so in suitable cases “the court
will add words, or omit
The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Bombay vs The Elphinstone Spinning Andweaving ... on 4 May, 1960
these words may be ignored as being
surplusage or a drafting error, and refers to rulings in
which such a course was adopted. The first ... Income-tax v. Linsleys Ltd. (3). It dealt with an obvious
drafting error. Section 68(2) of the English Finance
Act,1952, contained a reference
Corporation Of The City Of Nagpur vs The Nagpur Handloom Cloth Marketco. Ltd on 7 December, 1962
appearing on behalf of the Corporation submitted
that there was a drafting error in rule 10 (a), and as a
matter of interpretation the Court