However it appears that while drafting the notice, due
to typographical error, it is mentioned in the last paragraph of the
notice ... mentioned as 27.10.2016. It is mere typographical
error while drafting the notice and it could not be considered that the
accused approached complainant for loan
thus,
evident that the first clerical error has been
committed while drafting the notice which was
sent through learned counsel to the petitioner
amendment was sought only to correct the typographical error
and clerical mistake committed while drafting the complaint and
the trial court was perfectly justified
that it was intended
to correct the typographical mistake and error occurred, while
drafting the complaint. Learned advocate submitted that it was a
curable infirmity
accused",
It is submitted that it was a typographical error. The application was
drafted during Covid period. It was a bona fide mistake
thus, evident that the
first clerical error has been committed while drafting the notice which was
sent through learned counsel to the petitioner
complaint stating that a clerical error has crept into
while drafting the same. The error according to him is regarding
the date of the promissory
However it appears that while drafting the notice, due
to typographical error, it is mentioned in the last paragraph of the
notice
counsel
for the accused seems more like an inadvertent error made during
drafting of the said affidavit and therefore, cannot be said to have
review the same except to correct a clerical or an arithmetical error. The section is based on an acknowledged principle of law that once ... clerical or an arithmetical error. The Supreme Court further observed that the new Section 362 of the Code which was drafted keeping in view