Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

will not be accepted except for compelling reasons such as obvious drafting errors. (See State of U.P. v. Dr. Vijay Anand Maharaj , Rananjaya Singh

Cbi vs . R. K. Sharma & Ors. Page No. 1 on 3 October, 2018 IN

The Present Case Was Registered On ... vs Pollonji Darabshaw ­ Air 1988 Sc 88 ... on 17

ground of error, omission or irregularity in the sanction unless in the opinion of the Court that such an error, omission or irregularity caused failure ... perused the testimony of Sanctioning Authority minutely and also perused Exhibits 50 (Draft Sanction Order) and 47 (Sanction Order). It reveals that

Dr. Arun Kumar Maurya vs The State Of U.P And Anr. on 7 July

denied the suggestion that his order of sanction was verbatum reproduction of draft sanction order made available to him or was prepared mechanically and reflected ... case, except for cases where there is a typographical or clerical error or a factual mistake whereunder fresh sanction order may be required

(C.B.I. vs . Rohit Sehgal) on 15 May, 2013 Judgement in the matter of

bribe was demanded. He denied the suggestion that CBI had prepared draft sanction order and that he had not applied his mind and had issued ... Inadvertently he was also given serial no. 10 instead of 11. The error was detected and corrected lateron. He deposed that

Neera Yadav vs Central Bureau Of Investigation on 2 August, 2017 Equivalent citations: AIR 2017

Duraimurugan vs State on 3 January, 2013 Author: M.Sathyanarayanan Bench: C.Nagappan , M.Sathyanarayanan