that it was intended
to correct the typographical mistake and error occurred, while
drafting the complaint. Learned advocate submitted that it was a
curable infirmity
sanction by PW No.10
Dahate needs to be looked into. The draft sanction (
Exh.28) is practically identical to the sanction order ... ground of any error, omission or
irregularity in the sanction granted
by the authority, unless it is
satisfied that such error, omission or
irregularity
this appeal on the ground that, the trial court
has committed grave error in taking the cognizance of the
5
Crl.A.No.467/2013 ... person must pay the same
through cheque or Demand Draft. Hence, the trial court failed to
consider the law and facts applicable to the case
bribe was demanded. He
denied the suggestion that CBI had prepared draft sanction order and that
he had not applied his mind and had issued ... Inadvertently he
was also given serial no. 10 instead of 11. The error was detected and
corrected lateron. He deposed that
Raksha Jindal vs Central Bureau Of Investigation on 5 March, 2015
Author: Siddharth Mridul
Bench
Raju Son Of Ram Das vs State Of U.P. on 27 November, 2007
Author
comes to the conclusion that the learned Magistrate has committed a blatant error in arriving at a conclusion that the offence with which the respondent ... respondent herein to pay the said amount by way of a demand draft drawin in favour of the appellant and payable at Chennai. In default
Akhtar vs State Of U.P. on 28 August, 2014
Author: Amar Saran
Bench: Amar
C.B.I. vs . S. Malaichamy on 12 December, 2012
IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL
Sh. Jitender Kumar vs . on 31 January, 2017
Jitender Kumar
Vs.
Sh. Faragat Ali Rana
