alter or review the same except to correct a clerical or arithmetical error. The section is based on an acknowledged principle of law that once ... altered except to the extent of correcting a clerical or arithmetical error. The reliance of the respondent on Talab Haji Hussain's case (supra
Court, we
are in accord. The High Court was in error
therefore in interfering with the powers of
the police in investigating into the offence ... Narasaraopet from the scene of the
occurrence. He contacted PW 13 to draft
the report addressed to the Circle
Inspector of Police
additional
urea from the Marketing Organization. Hence, the trial Court
committed grave error in acquitting the respondent. Other
material prosecution witnesses have also supported ... against him that he made some interpolations in
Release Order and Demand Draft. For the purpose of proving
those interpolations, prosecution did not examine
Crores in cash and also
received two demand drafts, one of Rs.2.00 Crores
and another of Rs.50.00 Lakhs. From the
observations ... took place on 24.08.2020
without uttering a word about the cash/demand
draft received by them and there is no whisper
about the same
Crores in cash and also
received two demand drafts, one of Rs.2.00 Crores
and another of Rs.50.00 Lakhs. From the
observations ... took place on 24.08.2020
without uttering a word about the cash/demand
draft received by them and there is no whisper
about the same
Jong Seuk Park President Korea Marine ... vs State Of U.P. And Another on 13
review the same except to correct a clerical or
an arithmetical error. The section is based on an
acknowledged principle of law that once ... altered except to the extent of correcting a clerical
or an arithmetical error. The reliance of the respondent on
Talab Haji Hussain case is misconceived
review the same except to correct a clerical or an arithmetical error.
The section is based on an acknowledged principle of law that once ... altered except to the extent of
correcting a clerical or an arithmetical error. The reliance of the
respondent on Talab Haji Hussain case is misconceived
said
judgment or order except to correct a clerical or
arithmetical error. This prohibition is complete and no
criminal court can review its own judgment ... impugned order the High Court only corrected
any clerical or arithmetical error. In fact the impugned
order is an order of review, as the earlier
State Bank Of India vs Rajendra Kumar Singh & Ors on 25 September, 1968
Equivalent
