Rajkumar Sahu vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 28 March, 2019
Rajkumar Sahu vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 28 March, 2019
Equivalent citations: AIR
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 1983 (2.08 seconds)Varsha Kapoor vs Uoi & Ors. on 3 June, 2010
interpretation
of statutes that the Court is obliged to correct obvious
drafting errors and adopt the constructive role of 'finding the
intention of Parliament
Rana Nahid @ Reshma @ Sana vs Sahidul Haq Chisti on 18 June, 2020
Rana Nahid @ Reshma @ Sana vs Sahidul Haq Chisti on 18 June, 2020
Equivalent citations: AIRONLINE
The Ratlam Bone And Fertilizer Co. vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh And Anr. on 3 April, 1974
entry No. 2, Schedule III, should be overlooked as a drafting error to give full meaning to the legislative intention of making all fertilizers other ... Schedule II and entry No. 2 of Schedule III. A drafting error of this magnitude cannot be presumed and such a result can be reached
Santosh Kumar Upadhyay vs State Of U.P. And 2 Others on 14 January, 2016
held to be correction of an obvious drafting error based on gender discrimination. The said amending act brings the granddaughter (daughter of a son) (married
Brite Rubber Processor Pvt. Ltd vs The State Of Tripura on 28 July, 2017
Clauses (a) and
[* It is, according to the petitioner-company an error in
drafting as it was meant to be a proviso to sub-clause
Vinod Kumar Singh vs Distt. Basic Education Officer & ... on 30 November, 2010
will not be accepted except for compelling reasons such as obvious drafting errors. (See State of U.P. and others vs. Vijay Anand Maharaj
Dr.Sirat & Others vs State Of Punjab & Another on 29 May, 2013
will
not be accepted except for compelling reasons such as obvious
drafting errors.
13. It is well settled that literal interpretation should be given
Phool Wati And Ors. vs Gur Sahai on 25 February, 1974
incorporated.
24. There can be no dispute in that there are drafting errors in 1973 Amendment. When revisions always lay and were ... Consequently, these words cannot be excluded from consideration and the proviso as drafted will have to be considered as a whole and given a proper
Dr.Neeta Jha & Anr vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 13 January, 2009
search for defects of drafting, much less
inexactitude of language employed. Indeed,
any such defects of drafting should be
ironed out as part ... this
result has been arrived at by pointing out
some drafting errors and some imperfection
in the language employed. If only the High
Court