mistakes occurring in the
2
said extract are typographical errors or are errors in the draft is a
matter for conjecture. It only demonstrates
raise any dispute whatsoever henceforth.”
In terms of the Settlement, Demand Draft dated 19th Septem-
ber, 2014 for Rs.3,00,000/- (Rupees Three Lakhs ... complainant-daughter-in-law but there is a
typographical error in the said draft with regard to surname of
the complainant. For that purpose
error committed by them, these (newly
added Judges) not being part of the original bench had no
occasion to commit any error, and therefore, should ... submission made before us is that very
often review petitions are inartistically drafted consisting of
many grounds. One good ground which is sufficient is
drowned
review the same except to correct a clerical
or an arithmetical error. The section is based on an
acknowledged principle of law that once ... altered except to the extent of correcting a
clerical or an arithmetical error. The reliance of the
respondent on Talab Haji Hussain case is misconceived
grounds urged in support of the prayer for
review. We find no error apparent on the face of the record to warrant
recall ... delay in filing review petition and
exemption from procedure in drafting and exemption from filing
petition for review strictly as per rules and order
passed by the respondents do not suffer from any
infirmity, illegality or error in law and they are
perfectly justified and in accordance with ... application on 18.8.2005
along with all the relevant documents and demand
draft of Rs.1,000/- for grant of retail outlet.
Thereafter, the team
Chandana Das(Malakar) vs The State Of West Bengal And Others on 11 December, 2014
I.P.Holding Asia Singapore P.Ltd. vs Securities & Exch.Board Of India on
Uday Shankar Rao vs Amarendera Kumar Dutta on 22 September, 2014
Bench: T.S. Thakur
Goa Foundation vs Union Of India . on 21 April, 2014
Rm Reportable
IN THE SUPREME
