Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

contention of the petitioner's Counsel is that due to drafting error, it has been incorrectly mentioned in Paragraph 6 that the petitioner

However it appears that while drafting the notice, due to typographical error, it is mentioned in the last paragraph of the notice ... mentioned as 27.10.2016. It is mere typographical error while drafting the notice and it could not be considered that the accused approached complainant for loan

complaint stating that a clerical error has crept into while drafting the same. The error according to him is regarding the date of the promissory

However it appears that while drafting the notice, due to typographical error, it is mentioned in the last paragraph of the notice

Minister describing the offences committed against him by way of conspiracy. A draft information of the FIR was sent by the petitioner for initiation ... case, however, neither he was informed that there was any factual/legal error nor any communication was made to him from the higher Office

concerned authorities/examination bodies had adopted a procedure for inviting objections to draft answer keys and having the same evaluated by experts. In such cases ... cases where the action of the body is afflicted with palpable error or where it is found that the body of experts has not acted

alter or review the same except to correct a clerical or arithmetical error. The Section is based on an acknowledge principle of law that once ... altered except to the extent of correcting a clerical or arithmetical error. The reliance of the respondent on Talab Haji Hussain's case (supra

alter or review the same except to correct a clerical or arithmetical error. The Section is based on an acknowledged principle of law that once ... altered except to the extent of correcting a clerical or arithmetical error. The reliance of the respondent on Talab Haji Hussain's case (supra

court on the following grounds. (a) The trial court has committed an error in law by taking cognizance of the offence and as such ... more than Rs.20,000/- must pay same through cheque or Demand Draft. (e) The complainant has not proved existence of legally enforceable debt. With

regard to receipt of Rs.1,60,000/- by way of Demand draft bearing No.992663 drawn on State Bank of India ... dispute to the Lok-Adalath. The Trial Court has committed serious error in referring the dispute before the Lok-Adalath. Hence, the judgment and order