Indore Development Authority vs Shailendra (Dead) Through Its Lrs. And ... on 8 February, 2018
Indore Development Authority vs Shailendra (Dead) Through Its Lrs. And ... on 8 February, 2018
Equivalent
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 1966 (1.15 seconds)Nutan Batra vs M/S Buniyaad Associates on 14 December, 2018
Section 16 :
"6.4.2 Here again, there is a clear drafting error which
gives rise to conflict with section 21 of the Legal Services
Authorities
Amrita Prithwishwar Bhattacharjee And ... vs State Government Of Maharashtra And 5 ... on 26 October, 2018
Amrita Prithwishwar Bhattacharjee And ... vs State Government Of Maharashtra And 5 ... on 26 October, 2018
Riyaz Ahmad Bhat vs State Of J&K; & Others on 12 February, 2018
Riyaz Ahmad Bhat vs State Of J&K; & Others on 12 February, 2018
Vishwanath Gahininath Thore vs The Collector/Additional Collector ... on 1 September, 2018
case of some obvious causus omissus or some
obvious drafting error. Rather, it is legitimate to proceed on the
basis that the legislature, in enacting
State Of Raj And Ors vs Mst Santosh Devi on 28 August, 2018
been wrongly used, and
appears to be a drafting error.
9. A fair, reasonable and purposive
interpretation of three events under sub-rule
State Of Raj And Ors vs Smt Narayani Devi on 24 August, 2018
been wrongly used, and
appears to be a drafting error.
9. A fair, reasonable and purposive
interpretation of three events under sub-rule
State Of Raj And Ors vs Smt Geeta Kumari on 24 August, 2018
been wrongly used, and
appears to be a drafting error.
9. A fair, reasonable and purposive
interpretation of three events under sub-rule
State Of Raj And Ors vs Smt Rajeshwari on 24 August, 2018
been wrongly used, and
appears to be a drafting error.
9. A fair, reasonable and purposive
interpretation of three events under sub-rule
Sh. Mukesh Malhotra vs Sh. Pramod Sahani on 10 December, 2018
that the third floor of the suit property was only a drafting error. The
said plea was never taken by the Respondent which is reaffirmed ... Trial Court to treat the
pleading of plaintiff as drafting error is set aside as the same was neither the
pleading of the Respondent