bus, he
was advised by the conductor of the bus to travel on the
roof top of the bus. Therefore, submitted that the driver ... responsibility of the conductor and driver of the bus is
more onerous compared to claimant. The driver and
conductor of the bus were very well
bus to request the conductor of the bus to allow him to sit inside the bus as some of the passengers had alighted. This request ... bus. The deceased accordingly, got back to the roof of the bus to continue his journey. While the bus was nearing Boral bus stand
from the top bus of the to request the conductor of the bus to allow him to sit inside the bus as some ... bus. The deceased accordingly, got back to the roof of the bus to continue his journey. While the bus was nearing Boral bus stand
sitting on the top of the bus, when the
bus came near Anur village, the driver of the bus drove the
5
same with high ... bus, therefore, to that extent the claimant is
also guilty of negligence. The bus driver and conductor are
7
also negligent in allowing
conductor
or driver of the bus to sit on the rooftop of the bus. It is
also not his case that the bus was crowded ... conductor or driver of the offending bus and further he
was an unauthorized gratuitous passenger. Infact, the
driver and conductor of the bus were
negligence on his
part especially when the respondent No.2,
the truck driver had no case that the
appellant was negligent."
(underlining ... plea that is available to the
driver and conductor of the bus/driver, conductor and owner
of the bus, they must specifically plead the contributory
bus, the deceased had boarded on roof-top of the bus without heeding to the request, caution and warnings given by the driver and conductor ... driver and conductor was not proved or established, such a plea remained a plea only. Neither the driver nor the conductor of the bus
conductor of the bus and the
bus after passing Rampur Canal at that time the bus
was stopped as the signal was given ... driver and conductor of the bus and the bus was burnt
to ashes.
PW-10 is the complainant being driver of the bus
had lodged
sustained by him and nor the driver of the bus. Of course, neither the driver nor the conductor of the bus was examined ... conductor or the driver. Further, it is also not stated by him specifically that the driver or conductor of the bus knew that
negligent driving of the bus. Petitioner had boarded the Bus without the knowledge of the driver and conductor and the petitioner himself was responsible ... driving of the Bus and the petitioner was on the top of the Bus without the knowledge of the driver and conductor of the Bus
