that the driver
is a representative of the owner if he was driving under the
owner's instructions or permission and is thus owner ... consideration is whether the legal representatives of a
person, who was driving a motor vehicle, after borrowing it from
the real owner meets with
result whereof one Dr. P. Ramachandra Reddy
who was driving the scooter fell down and succumbed to the
injuries, the same day. A claim petition ... Rajinder Pal Singh who was the cleaner/conductor of the bus
was driving the bus at the relevant time when the accident
took place resulting
Evidence Act -Res ipsa loquitur-If applicable in
criminal trials-Appellant driving a bus on a narrow road
with deep ditches on both sides ... record.
HEADNOTE:
The appellant, who was a driver of a bus, was driving
the vehicle by a road which ran through a village. On either
following conditions, namely:
(a) to (d)
(ii) a condition excluding driving by a named person of persons or by any
person who is not duly ... person who has been disqualified
for holding or obtaining a driving licence during the period of
disqualification: or"
To be noted that Section
deceased. P.C.
Kurian, who was the 3rd respondent, was driving the bus at the time of
the accident and 1st respondent, Kunjujamma Mohan ... alleged that the accident occurred solely due to rash and
negligent driving of the bus driver, P.C. Kurian and the vehicle had
valid insurance
Section 9 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988
9. Grant of driving licence. - (1) Any person who is not for the time being disqualified ... holding or obtaining a driving licence may apply to [any licensing authority in the State].
(i) in which he ordinarily resides or carries on business
machinery” means any shaft, wheel, drum, pulley, system of pulleys, coupling, clutch, driving belt or other appliance or device by which the motion
permanent disability and 100%
functional disability, contending that his primary livelihood
of driving heavy transport vehicles (HTVs) had been
curtailed on account of his amputation ... indicates that the accident was caused due
to the rash and negligent driving of Jeep No. RST4701 by
respondent No.2, which fact
held
that since the owner never gave permission to his cleaner to
drive, he could not he held guilty of the breach of the
contractual ... imposed by s. 84
of the Act which provides that no person driving or in
charge of a motor vehicle shall cause or allow
working as a Khalasi in the
said taxi. He used to drive the said vehicle sometimes. He had a driving
licence. Driving licence, however ... granted to him for driving a Light
Motor Vehicle. The said taxi met with an accident on 14.8.2000 at about
