near the T-point junction with Sher Shah road, the petitioner was driving a vehicle bearing registration number HR 29C 9552 in a rash ... negligent manner and while so driving hit against a motorcycle bearing registration number UMS 2937 and caused fatal injury to one Gajendra Singh
Names and address of the driver of the offending vehicle.
(iv) Driving license of the driver of the offending vehicle.
(v) Names and address ... days of the application
The Registration authorities shall verify the registration certificate,
driving licence, fitness and permit in respect of the offending
vehicle within
died in the accident that occurred on 17.03.1993
involving rash driving of Maruti Van bearing No. DL 2CB 2882 (the
offending vehicle), admittedly insured against ... case of the claimants that the accident had occurred due to
negligent driving of the said offending vehicle by Sunil (first
respondent before the tribunal
peace with the conscience of
Section 96 , the condition excluding driving by a person
not duly licensed is not absolute and the promisor is
absolved ... Supreme Court observed as under:-
"It is not disputed that the driving licence of the driver
of the vehicle had expired
Smt Dhaneshwari & Anr. vs Tejeshwar Singh & Ors. on 19 March, 2012
Author: G
However, on account of violation of the policy with
respect to the driving licence, the Claims Tribunal granted
recovery rights to the appellant to recover ... submitted that the driver of the
offending vehicle was holding a driving licence by which he
was authorized to drive motorcycle and light motor vehicles
about 8.30 a.m. the petitioner was driving bus No. DEP 6107 in a rash and negligent manner and while so driving, he tried ... Singh (DW 2) in support of his defense that his act of driving the bus was not the proximate cause of the death
June, 2008 resulted in grievous
injuries to the appellant. The appellant was driving his two
wheeler scooter No.DL-6SP-1632 while coming from ... with respect to accident having been caused due to
rash and negligent driving of Maruti Van No.DL-2C-R-6342.
The appellant also
Claim Petitions it was stated that the Respondent Sunil Kumar
was driving the tempo at about 12:00 midnight in a rash and negligent
manner ... driver of the tempo
did not possess a valid and effective driving licence to drive the vehicle
involved in the accident. Thus, it was stated
prosecution examined twelve witnesses to prove the fact of
rash and negligent driving by the petitioner and accordingly the petitioner
was convicted ... counsel for the
petitioner that the fact of rash and negligent driving by the petitioner has
not been proved beyond any reasonable doubt
