Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

accused person for the purpose of obtaining it, or when he was drunk, or because it was made in answer to questions which he need

enmity with the accused. PW1 denied the suggestions that he was drunk on the date of incident due to which he had fallen ... complainant Nabi Mohd. @ Bhure to fight with everyone; he always remain drunk and kept quarreling with many people. Accused further stated he is innocent

intention to commit the offence. Even if the complainant/PW-1 was drunk, the accused had no right to beat him. The defence taken ... injured proves that he was drunk. No reason of quarrel or abusing was given. No inquiry was conducted regarding the brick nor any brick

vehicle. The prosecution had no case that the accused was either drunk or under the influence of any intoxicating substance. The road had reasonable visibility ... that the driver of the car, that is, the accused herein was drunk. The people who had gathered had caught the accused and handed over

Appellant inside the vehicle before the journey commenced as the Appellant was drunk, which consequently led to PW-6 implicating him by a false allegation ... taxi. That, PW-6 has also categorically deposed that the Appellant was drunk. Considering the condition of the Appellant, the offence of sexual assault cannot

when the accused-appellant Ram Janam Maurya, who is a neighbour, came drunk and started abusing the informant. The accused-appellant held the informant ... supported the prosecution case and has stated that the accused-appellant was drunk and abused and slapped him which led to altercation resulting in sudden

very short distance from his residence. Appellant Satyasing (A/1) came drunk. He asked Rahul to pay him money for consumption of alcohol. It appears ... When the deceased Rahul was taking his dinner, A/1 had come drunk and made a demand for money. He even put his hand

suggestion was also given to this witness that he and Binod both drunk wine and also -6- Cr. Appeal (DB) No.479 of 2015 assaulted ... wrong to say that Bihari Hembram and Tala Murmu both had drunk wine and also fought each other and her husband sustained injury on account

people of this country will accept a lying Bhartiya Janata Party leadership drunk with power because they know that, what the Bhartiya Janata Party ... people of this country will accept a lying Bhartiya Janata Party leadership drunk with power because they know that, what the Bhartiya Janata Party

last contention of learned counsel for the accused is that accused was drunk in the function and due to his mistake the accident has occurred ... Ramappa by the learned APP that all of them were drunk in the function. The eye witnesses have denied the same. The mere inadvertent suggestion