when there is
application for duplicate SIM. To the question whether without verifying
the forged identity proof duplicate SIM was issued DW3 admitted that
only ... faulted in issuing a duplicate SIM without
proper verification. Application for duplicate SIM was made on 22.03.2012 while the
SIM of the Complainant was very
SIM card
with the original documents and the data available in the CAF of
original SIM owner. But, if such duplicate SIM was not issued ... duplicate SIM issued in an
41
apparent negligent manner, the Telecom Service the Provider
which has issued the duplicate SIM and made it operational
SIM card
with the original documents and the data available in the CAF of
original SIM owner. But, if such duplicate SIM was not issued ... duplicate SIM issued in an
41
apparent negligent manner, the Telecom Service the Provider
which has issued the duplicate SIM and made it operational
when there is
application for duplicate SIM. To the question whether without verifying
the forged identity proof duplicate SIM was issued DW3 admitted that
only ... faulted in issuing a duplicate SIM without
proper verification. Application for duplicate SIM was made on 22.03.2012 while the
SIM of the Complainant was very
when there is
application for duplicate SIM. To the question whether without verifying
the forged identity proof duplicate SIM was issued DW3 admitted that
only ... faulted in issuing a duplicate SIM without
proper verification. Application for duplicate SIM was made on 22.03.2012 while the
SIM of the Complainant was very
when there is
application for duplicate SIM. To the question whether without verifying
the forged identity proof duplicate SIM was issued DW3 admitted that
only ... faulted in issuing a duplicate SIM without
proper verification. Application for duplicate SIM was made on 22.03.2012 while the
SIM of the Complainant was very
managed. It was the connivance, between Telecom
Service provider, in issuing duplicate SIM Card and the Bank
concerned, which resulted this fraud.
23.The gross ... duplicate SIM was issued to fraudster. The original SIM Card was
issued at Pune, while duplicate was issued at Nasik and registered
address of business
managed. It was the connivance, between Telecom
Service provider, in issuing duplicate SIM Card and the Bank
concerned, which resulted this fraud.
23.The gross ... duplicate SIM was issued to fraudster. The original SIM Card was
issued at Pune, while duplicate was issued at Nasik and registered
address of business
managed. It was the connivance, between Telecom
Service provider, in issuing duplicate SIM Card and the Bank
concerned, which resulted this fraud.
23.The gross ... duplicate SIM was issued to fraudster. The original SIM Card was
issued at Pune, while duplicate was issued at Nasik and registered
address of business
managed. It was the connivance, between Telecom
Service provider, in issuing duplicate SIM Card and the Bank
concerned, which resulted this fraud.
23.The gross ... duplicate SIM was issued to fraudster. The original SIM Card was
issued at Pune, while duplicate was issued at Nasik and registered
address of business
