Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 204 (1.05 seconds)

State vs Rehan @ Gaonwala on 10 January, 2017

Vinod Kumar seized the same. Crime team also inspected this spot i.e. Flat No. 3491A/3rd floor, Kucha Lal Man, Daryaganj.   Ct. Vijay ... tampering with the case property, before the material exhibits i.e.   cigarette   stubs   reached   FSL   for   DNA   analysis,   non­ compliance with provisions of   Section
Delhi District Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Arvind vs State on 9 March, 2017

seized by the police from the spot i.e. one sealed plastic box containing four cigarette butts sealed with the seal ... saliva was detected on Exhs.1A, 1B, 1C and 1D i.e. the cigarette butts. The DNA examination was conducted on the cigarette butts (Exhs
Delhi High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - G Mittal - Full Document

Dcit, Chennai vs M/S. A. T. C. Ltd., Hosur on 17 March, 2017

that the assessee company is having two manufacturing Divisions i.e. Leather Division and Cigarette Manufacturing Division. Though, the company has two Divisions, there ... assessee is carrying on business with two different activities i.e. Leather Division and Cigarette Division. The Ld.AR argued that both the Divisions
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Chennai Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Section 31 in The Cigarettes And Other Tobacco Products (Prohibition Of Advertisement And Regulation Of Trade And Commerce, Production, Supply And Distribution) Act, 2003 [Entire Act]

cigarettes or other tobacco products under clause (o) of section 3; (b) specify the maximum permissible nicotine and tar contents in cigarettes or other tobacco ... indicate the nicotine and tar contents in cigarettes or other tobacco products under section 10; (e) provide for the manner in which entry into
Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 18
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next