than 20 years, as of right, and have acquired prescriptive right of easment to flow the water through Nali & pipes and take the light ... plaintiff; that the plaintiff did not acquire any prescriptive right of easment of taking light and air from Gali in question through the alleged windows
argued that plaintiff claims right of way on
the principle of easment by grant as predecessor of title of
Page 6 of 15
Uploaded ... through field of plaintiff, yet on other hand referred to principle
of easment by prescription defined in section 15 and believed
that defendant has failed
track. Therefore, the defendants are entitled to the
suit cart track through easment by grant and easment by necessity.
5. Apart from filing the written ... their right over it. As such they have
prescribed their rights of easment over it. Originally, the properties
owned by the defendants and the plaintiffs
therefore, by operation of Section 60 of the Indian
Easments Act, the licence becomes irrevocable.
(iv) Defendants have filed a comprehensive suit for
partition ... operation of Section 60 of the
Easments Act, the records show that the defendants did
not raise such plea specifically before the trial Court
rights of the Plaintiff."
5. Suit was filed for declaring easment rights against
defendants. Present respondent has purchased disputed
property before filing ... that seller had
obtained title through Will. Plaintiff in the suit for easment right
intend to challenge proprietary of the Will, which bestow in
predecessor
situate in Kothan Other street, where the Plaintiff has a right
of easment for passage or way''.
4.The appellant/Plaintiff contended that ... will make it clear that the appellant herein/plaintiff wanted to claim
easment over the disputed stretch of land only as an easement of necessity
civil law. Employed in leases for the purpose of
including any easments or servitudes used or enjoyed with
the demised premises. A thing
licensee technically so called under the provisions of Section 52, Easments Act, but which are less than those of a lessee properly so called under
raised a presumption and confirmed the rights under Section 60 of the Easments Act in favor of the petitioners since such structures or constructions were
such right, he unlawful and such right does not amount to an easment, or an interest in the property. A lease, on the other hand
