Satish Kumar Goyal vs M/S Ahlawat Developer on 10 May, 2023
deciphered that complainant did suffered mental agony, which is compound effect of OP's fallacy, and it must had added to the tale
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 1327 (0.99 seconds)Shree Ganga Finance Pvt. Ltd vs Sangeeta Malhotra on 24 January, 2012
with permissible interest at the rate
of 13% per annum compounded annually with effect from 3.9.1999 for 36
months. Similarly the respondent made another deposit ... months bearing interest at the
rate of 15% per annum compounded with effect from 31.8.1992.
3. It was pleaded by the respondent that she repeatedly
Sakshi vs Industrial Development Bank Of India on 11 March, 2011
alongwith interest @ 3.5% on
quarterly compounding basis with effect from 1.12.2006 until the amount was
paid to her alongwith costs. It was
further submitted that ... alongwith interest @ 3.5 per annum, on
quarterly compounding basis, with effect from 1.12.2006, till the amount is actually paid to her. The OPs shall also
Akhlesh Aggarwal vs Industrial Development Bank Of India on 11 March, 2011
alongwith interest @ 3.5% on
quarterly compounding basis with effect from 1.12.2006, until the amount was
paid to him alongwith costs. It was
further submitted that ... alongwith interest @ 3.5 per annum on
quarterly compounding basis, with effect from 1.12.2006, till the amount is actually paid to him. The OPs
shall also
Mrs. Asha Vij vs Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. on 12 January, 2017
Mrs. Asha Vij vs Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. on 12 January, 2017
Daily Order
STATE
St. Stephen'S Hospital vs Om Prakash Seth on 19 April, 2023
shock, trauma and sepsis. It is a class of compounds (drugs) that
act by inotropic effect on heart muscle (causing more intense
contractions) that
Arvind Mills Limited. vs The New India Assurance Co-Ltd. on 18 November, 2021
thereon at the rate of 18% per annum, to be
compounded quarterly with effect from 1st January, 2003, till the
date of realization thereof
Puja Garg vs M/S Manohar Infrastructure & ... on 31 March, 2021
irregularities committed by the company stood compounded, as exemption granted will have retrospective effect; that delay if any in issuance of the said notification ... that the said exemption will have retrospective effect but in our considered opinion, it will have prospective effect only. The opposite parties were deficient
Bimal Jain vs M/S Manohar Infrastructure & ... on 19 April, 2021
irregularities committed by the company stood compounded, as exemption granted will have retrospective effect; that delay if any in issuance of the said notification ... that the said exemption will have retrospective effect but in our considered opinion, it will have prospective effect only. The opposite parties were deficient
Prem Lata vs M/S Manohar Infrastructure & ... on 17 March, 2021
irregularities committed by the company stood compounded, as exemption granted will have retrospective effect; that delay if any in issuance of the said notification ... that the said exemption will have retrospective effect but in our considered opinion, it will have prospective effect only. The opposite party was deficient