Therefore, he appears to have participated in an agitation, in which, the effigy of a political personality was allegedly burnt by him. Hence, a complaint ... follows :
'That on 4.10.2014 at 10.AM, the petitioner burnt the effigy of Subramaniam Swamy near the bus stand at Thirukoilur, to protest against
expressed in some permanent form e.g. writing,
printing, pictures, statue, waxmore effigy etc. A libel is of itself an
infringement of a right
organised a "Dharna" against him, had burnt his effigy after putting a
garland of shoes around his neck and had distributed posters levelling ... petitioner No.1 had pointed a pistol at the
head of the effigy and threatened to kill him. It was also alleged that
petitioners
registration of a criminal complaint against a person for burning the effigy of a political leader, while participating in a demonstration. Another related
expired in the
incident, who was the one who prepared the effigy of
'Ravan' for the celebration of 'Vijaya Dashmi'. Learned
expressed in some permanent form e.g. writing,
printing, pictures, statue, waxmore effigy etc. A libel is of itself an
infringement of a right
residence of the petitioner's Manager Mr.Kumarappan and burnt an effigy and further threatened danger to his life. After the incident, the said
October, 2010, number of persons had gone to watch the
burning of effigies of Ravan on the Dussehra festival. They watched
the mela at Nehru
Deepavali is celebrated. He questions why Ravanaa's effigies should be burnt on that date, as he claims, this amounts to a vendatta against
threatening the
Railway Administration by giving notices with regard to
burning of effigies of ministers and higher dignitaries. For
this act, he was issued with ... which he said that he will not threaten to
burn any effigy of any authority and will not participate in
any illegal things.
Contending that
