finger in her vagina. Put his penis in her mouth and
ejaculated.
3. Babita immediately rang up the police control room resulting ... then in the anal region and finally in her
mouth. After he ejaculated in her mouth, the appellant cleaned himself
using her underwear and told
evidence of P.W.-1 to show that
there was ejaculation at the time of the incident and as such, non-sending of
wearing apparels ... opinion that PW2 did not say that there was ejaculation on her
private parts or that such ejaculation touched the Gamchha or wearing
apparents
only on the ground that the person committing the rape, did
not ejaculate then and there on her private part or it could be
that ... pointed out by the Doctor, there could
not have been any ejaculation, however, there was redness on
the private part of the victim
appellant cannot commit sexual act, he wrote :
"Patient could not ejaculate in casualty dressing room
so semen sample could not be taken ... appellant's MLC
Ex.PW-2/B : the appellant could not ejaculate in the casualty dressing room.
The appellant obviously has erectile disfunctionality
accused (Ex.PX-1) that "Pt. not
able to ejaculate, so semen sample could not be taken". It is also
mentioned that ... When the accused was not able to ejaculate and give his semen
sample and when the doctor has not examined his private parts to
ascertain
into her private part. It was further stated that it resulted
in ejaculation. Thereafter, she returned to the house of
Chinnamma and the matter ... pertinent to
note that even though there is allegation that there was
ejaculation and it fell in petticoat, this is not proved by forensic
evidence
treated as
complete only on ejaculation in vagina. Slightest penetration
for a shortest time was sufficient to bring the offence under
the purview of committing
treated as
complete only on ejaculation in vagina. Slightest penetration
for a shortest time was sufficient to bring the offence under
the purview of committing
informed that accused
3
took her inside the new house and ejaculated on her pant
and she suspected that the accused has tried to rape
consent culminated with staining of her clothes by semen which was ejaculated
by the penis of the appellant. She has further stated that her husband
