filed suit in
O.S.No.931/2008 for ejection of the petitioner and
respondents 4 and 5. The trial court by its judgment ... stay.
In the meanwhile, the respondents 1 to 3 have filed execution
petition in E.P.No.726/2014. In the said execution, the
executing
impugned order dated 2.1.2014 the Court
below has refused to stay the execution proceedings
pending on the file of Executing Court on the ground that ... 1207/2007 is filed by the respondent herein for
ejectment of the petitioner from the suit property.
3. Be that as it may, suits were
2014 ON THE AFFIDAVIT
-2-
FILED BY THE PETITION JDR IN EXECUTION 50/2013 AS PER
ANNX-J.
DIRECT THE LEARNED SR. CIVIL JUDGE ... COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: -
ORDER
The impugned order dated 4.3.2014 passed in
Execution Case No.50/2013 is called in question in this
petition
CWJC No.9145 of 2011 (22) dt.10-09-2014
11/12
ejectment he cannot be debarred from cross examination of
plaintiff's witnesses ... petitioner, through sale deed dated 04.12.1978. The defendant-
petitioner has not denied execution of sale deed in favour of Late
Shanti Devi, mother of Ganesh
admittedly occupied by respondent No.1 as a
tenant, against whom the ejectment order was passed by
the Rent Controller as well as the Appellate ... March 04,
2004.
It is stated that the petitioner has filed execution
proceedings against respondent No.1 in which
respondent No.2 has also filed
liable to be ejected on this
ground?OPA
5.Relief."
Vide order dated 21.3.2011, the Rent Controller allowed the
ejectment petition. The said order ... month.
Raj Kumari
Although, the petitioner had denied the execution of the rent note but
2014.02.21 14:53
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity
7189/2009, decreeing the suit for ejectment filed by the
respondents.
2. The facts of the case in brief are that the site ... rents regularly
nor vacating the suit schedule property, the respondents filed
the ejectment suit.
3. The appellant - defendant filed the written statement
taking serious exception
herein unconditionally and without driving the respondents
herein to take possession through execution proceedings.
His submission is placed on record.
5. In view ... licensor namely
IOCL and as such they filed a suit for ejectment in
O.S.No.1347/2005 against their licensor namely IOCL
which ultimately
human habitation ? OPA
6. Relief"
Learned Rent Controller dismissed the ejectment petition
filed by the respondents vide order dated 13.1.2011. However, the
appeal filed ... Krishan Lal.
In the facts and circumstances of the present case, the
execution of the agreement to sell in question by Taro Devi in favour
Section 13 of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949
seeking ejectment of the petitioners from the demised premises.
The said petition was conditionally ... notice was issued to the
decree holder. Respondent filed the execution petition on 2.4.2011.
Singh Gurpreet
2014.03.13 10:22
I attest to the accuracy
