that possession has been taken in execution of the
order of ejectment passed by the Rent Controller, Ellenabad and only the
issue of mesne profits
process of law by filing execution
case No.2014/2013. He had also filed petition against
one Somasunder for ejectment in HRC No.147/2012 ... same by filing
execution case No.2014/2013. He had also filed petition
against one Somasunder for ejectment in HRC
No.147/2012. Present plaintiff
West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955
WEST BENGAL
India
West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955
heart of the city and in case the stay of execution and
enforcement of eviction order dated 26.08.2016 is not
stayed, the appellant-tenant will ... with the question where the landlord had
claimed that even after an ejectment order having been
passed, there was no provision for claiming mesne profits
petitioner had filed a suit against the respondent no.2 for ejectment of the
respondent no.2 from an immovable property claiming that the respondent ... parte decree for ejectment of the respondent no.2 was passed
in favour of the petitioner and the petitioner sought execution thereof, the
respondent
which is 3 days after the execution
application had been filed and similarly, in order to avoid the ejectment
and to comply with the terms ... further cause of
action left with the respondent-landlord to pursue the execution petition
and the same is, accordingly, dismissed. It will always be open
heart of the city and in case the stay of execution and
enforcement of eviction order dated 26.08.2016 is not
stayed, the appellant-tenant will ... with the question where the landlord had
claimed that even after an ejectment order having been
passed, there was no provision for claiming mesne profits
appellant in execution. It is already held that it is the Controller under the Act that has exclusive jurisdiction to order ejectment of a tenant ... inherently lacks jurisdiction to entertain the suit and pass a decree of ejectment. Therefore, though the decree was passed and the jurisdiction of the Court
1076/2016, being aggrieved of the order dated
26.9.2016 in the said execution petition, directing the
petitioner ... case are that the
respondent and another filed suit for ejectment against
3
one Sri Shabarish and the suit came to be decreed
petitioner, he as a plaintiff filed a Title Suit for
ejectment of the complainant/opposite party No. 2 before the Court of learned
Munsiff ... said judgment
regarding the ejectment suit and the learned Munsiff after hearing the parties, by
order dated 26.10.2006 stayed the execution of decree passed