Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

defendants 2 and 3. Hence, the suit was filed for ejectment. 3. Written statement was filed by the defendants 1 and 2. According to them ... vide order dated 25.02.2016. 6. When the above decree was put into execution in EP.No.36 of 2014 by the first respondent, the revision

year 01.09.2013, much prior to the institution of the suit, therefore, the Execution proceedings initiated pursuant to the decree passed in a suit, which ... been passed against him, and hence, the second defendant cannot avoid the execution. Thus, by averring so, the learned counsel prayed for setting aside

eject the revision petitioner from the tenanted premises, which had been decreed on 30.11.2017. Pursuant to the decree and judgment, an Execution Petition has been

Pushpavalli Suresh Babhu vs M/S.Sopos Technology Pvt. Ltd on 29 July, 2025 Author