subsequent proceedings, in the ejectment suit, in E.S.No.39 of 1984, and in the execution petition ... been passed against Araniammal, in the ejectment suit, in E.S.No.39 of 1984. Thereafter, execution proceedings had also been initiated against Araniammal
held as follows:
In a suit for ejectment while in execution of a decree if resistance is offered or where obstruction proceeds from the claimant ... filed under Section 41 of the Tamilnadu City Tenants Protection Act in Ejectment Suit No.36 of 2002 on the file of III Small Cause
that when the lease is subsisting, a decree
for ejectment cannot be put into execution. He further pointed out that the
claim of the writ
T.S. Senthil Kumar vs The Government Of Tamil Nadu on 10 February, 2010
Author
M/S.Schmenger Gmbh And Company Leder vs M/S.Saddler Shoes Private Limited on
M/S.Jagal Priya Medicals vs Tmt.Mangammal on 19 August, 2010
Author: G.Rajasuria
C. Gnanasekaran vs The Inspector General Of Registration on 5 August, 2010
Author: N.Paul
T.Thangamani vs Tmt.Mangammal on 19 August, 2010
Author: G.Rajasuria
Bench: G.Rajasuria
plaintiff and the 1st defendant wakf with regard to the execution of the joint lease of land in favour of the 1st defendant wakf. Thus ... During the pendency of the said appeal, the 1st defendant filed an ejectment suit No.2 of 2000 before the 3rd Small Causes Court, Chennai
C.Venkatesh vs M/S.Vel Beds on 18 August, 2010
Author: G.Rajasuria
Bench
