Gupta, judgment debtor no.1 of the present execution. Therefore, the pleadings in
the above two cases clearly shows and proves that ... suit, the object of the landlord is to eject the sub
lessee from the land in execution of the decree and such an object
admitted facts of the case are to the
contrary.
29. After the execution of the alleged
agreement for sale dated 20-7-1981, the
appellant ... asked the owner
to complete the sale and that too after the
ejectment suit was filed in February 1991 by
the owner.
30. Thus
admitted facts of the case are to the
contrary.
29. After the execution of the alleged
agreement for sale dated 20-7-1981, the
appellant ... asked the owner
to complete the sale and that too after the
ejectment suit was filed in February 1991 by
the owner.
30. Thus
Arjun Prasad Gupta & Anr vs Smt.Rita Rani Gupta on 23 March, 2010
APPEAL
Raj Pal Singh vs Smt. Harbans Kaur on 18 March, 2010
Equivalent citations: AIR 2010
Sh. Satish Kapoor vs Sh. Bal Kishan Katyal on 8 September, 2010
IN THE COURT
Suit No.33/2006 ("Jagdish Chander vs Tasleem") Doj : 25.01.2010 on 25 January
