appellant in execution. It is already held that
it is the Controller under the Act that has exclusive jurisdiction to
order ejectment of a tenant ... inherently lacks
jurisdiction to entertain the suit and pass a decree of ejectment.
Therefore, though the decree was passed and the jurisdiction of the
Court
terminated
by legal notice dated 10.11.2007 and the defendant is entitled to eject the
plaintiff from the suit property for which defendant has already filed ... plaintiff never came forward to negotiate
the terms and conditions for execution and registration of the lease deed
and therefore, the plaintiff remained a licensee
Harminder Singh vs Mr. Debamitra Sinha on 14 December, 2017
IN THE COURT OF SH
Ishmali Devi vs Delhi Development Authority on 17 October, 2017
Page 1 of 66
IN
Lac No. 10A/10/07 Union Of India vs . Harish Virmani & Ors. 1/171
Sh. Rama Nand vs Sh. Roop Ram on 12 December, 2017
IN THE COURT OF
Chander Mal vs . M/S Allied Reality Pvt. Ltd. & Ors on 29 April, 2017
Smt. Jatinder Kaur vs Ms. Priti Sharma on 31 May, 2017
IN THE COURT OF
Yudhisther Sharma vs Om Prakash Sharma on 21 January, 2017
IN THE COURT OF DR
Mr. Parveen Kumar Kataria vs Mr. Vijay Kumar on 23 August, 2017
IN THE COURT
