Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

State Of Gujarat And Ors. vs The Board Of Trustees Of Port Of Kandla ... on

beginning that the kobala was executed. So we find affirmance of the execution of the kobala in that contemporaneous document. It appears from Clause ... declared insolvent, the lease shall be cancelled and cause of action for ejectment would arise. These clauses in unmistakable terms indicate that the kobala

Bihari Lal And Ors. vs Union Of India, Etc. on 1 August, 1978 Equivalent citations

premises.... 19. It was held as follows: where admittedly after the execution of the lease deed, the tenant las sub-let some of the rooms ... Section 13(1)(e) sets out sub-letting as a ground for ejectment in the following terms: That the tenant had assigned, sublet or otherwise

Madhusudan Prasad Agarwal vs Smt. Shusma Bala Dasi And Anr. on 28 March, 1978 Equivalent

Chandra Bhushan Khanna And Ors. vs Brij Nandan Singh And Anr. on 25 May, 1978

converse of the present one because when the suit for ejectment against the tenant was decided no partition decree existed. Hence, it was rightly held ... drawn up and signed on plain paper. An application for execution was filed and considerable proceedings occurred thereon. At quite a late stage the objection

Ved Prakash Gupta vs Chotelal And Ors. on 8 February, 1978 Equivalent citations: AIR1978MP250, AIR

Inder Singh And Ors. vs The State Of Punjab And Ors. on 18 August, 1978

worth one thousand rupees other than the property exempt from attachment in execution of a decree, and the subject-matter of the suit." Thus ... plaintiff. After the amendment, properties which are exempt attachment in execution of a decree and subject-matter of the suit have to be excluded