suit, the decree-holder filed an execution case being Ejectment Execution Case No. 94 of 2000 before the
learned Second Bench, Small Causes Court
legal
representative.
Respondent-decree holder filed execution petition in the year
2003 for execution of the ejectment order. Petitioner preferred objections
in the execution petition ... demised property pursuant to ejectment order and therefore,
petitioner is not liable to be ejected from the demised property in execution
of the ejectment order
19th June, 2010 for recovery of
possession of the suit property by execution of the writ of
possession by police help.
Under such circumstances ... case, this court passes an order staying all further
proceeding of Ejectment Execution Case No. 11 of 2009
pending before the learned Civil Judge (Junior
opposite parties intimating the above order.
All further proceedings of Ejectment Execution Case No. 70 of 2007
pending before the learned Judge 3rd Bench
opposite parties intimating the above order.
All further proceedings of Ejectment Execution Case No. 37 of 2009
pending before the learned Additional Civil Judge (Junior
Swapan Kumar Mallick.
... For the Petitioner.
Since the execution of an eviction decree is awaiting disposal before
the learned Executing Court since 2008; this Court ... petitioner that
presently there is no impediment in disposing of the Ejectment Execution Case
No. 82 of 2008 disposes of this revisional application under Article
Annexure P/6 by this Court, Manjit Kaur
did not contest the ejectment petition. This contention would reveal as to
why the instant suit ... petition thereafter and
present suit is a device to frustrate the execution of ejectment order which
is stated to have been passed again against Manjit
Collector, Ist
Grade, Panipat vide order dated 23.8.1990 dismissed the execution
by observing that ejectment order passed on 19.12.1980 and Appel-
late order dated ... petitioners/plaintiffs before the Executing Court hearing the execution
for the ejectment of the petitioners on 23.8.1990. Undisputedly, exe-
cution was dismissed by the Executing
Parshad (since deceased).
Charan Dass - respondent Decree Holder (DH) filed execution
petition for execution of decree dated 28.10.2002 passed in his favour
against Gaya Parshad ... petitioners from the suit property has been stayed in execution of ejectment
orders, which have been challenged in the said revision petition
India, petitioner is seeking directions to respondents No.1 and 2 for
execution of the order dated 18.2.2009 passed under section 7 of the Punjab ... referred to as
"the Act") for ejectment of respondents No. 3 to 5 by execution pending in
the Court of Assistant Collector, Jind