petitioners for execution of the judgment and decree dated
31.8.1981 have been dismissed. This case has checkered history. In a suit
for ejectment a decree
default of payment of rent. Accordingly, the complainant filed
a suit for ejectment and recovery of arrears of rent and mesne profits ... been also decreed. On
the basis of said decrees complainant filed an execution petition in
Execution Petition No.2506/15. While executing the attachment
warrant
subsisting allotment during the pendency
of the eviction petition or issuance and execution of
warrants? OPP
(9) Whether signatory to the written statement filed ... possession / ejectment in respect of
property no.J19, Hauz Khas, New Delhi. Plaintiffs were in occupation of
ground floor thereof and in execution
stage, and, it is conceded by
Mr. Yogheshwar Prasad, even in execution proceedings on
the ground that the decree was a nullity. If one
reads ... concerned reads as follows
"209 Ejectment of persons occupying land without
title
(1) A person taking or retaining possession of land
otherwise than
plaint, as such, no decree could have been passed for ejectment
for uncertainity of the property description. It is further stated that
an application ... that the
judgment and decree of similarly placed occupier against whom
the ejectment proceeding was preferred was dismissed and it was
held that Ramsundar
recording the
same, passed the following order:
“As per compromise, decree for ejectment and for Rs
165 with proportionate costs is passed in favour ... properties
within the time mentioned in the compromise memo, the
landlord levied execution. It was resisted by the tenant on
various grounds one of which
Raj Kishan Pershad vs The Joint Collectori, Ranga Reddy ... on 17 July, 2018
Author: V
Narinder Kumar vs Rohit Madan & Others on 3 August, 2018
Author: Sanjay Karol
Bench
decreed by the trial court
vide judgment and decree dated 23.9.1995 directing ejectment on
the ground of bonafide need and arrears of rent. The defendant ... dismissed on 8.9.2006 confirming
the findings of the Trial Court. Its execution was filed on 5.1.2007
by Munnibai, Pradeep Kumar Jain and Madhvi Jain being
being declared void
thereby the right over the immoveable property, possession
and ejectment thereof has been recognized which are
incidental and ancillary. The Court ... such acts, or employing such
means, as are essentially necessary to its execution."
19. Further more, the Supreme Court in case
