appellant is as tenant at sufferance and is liable to ejectment in due
course of law. But his possession is not legal nor lawful ... appellant may remain in possession until he is ejected in due
course in execution of the decree in the suit filed by the respondent
appellant may remain in possession
until his ejectment in due course in execution of
the decree in the suit filed by the respondent
defendants in the Ejectment Suit to stay all further proceedings
in Execution Petition No.132 of 2019 along with the petition for condoning
the delay ... order in respect of the execution proceedings or
execution application taken by the parties in connection with the execution
of the decree of any value
filed execution petition in E.P. No.3550 of
1993 as against one Mr.Syed Akbar, based on the judgment and decree for
ejectment made ... Obstructors preferred A.S. No.272 of 2002. The order of
the execution Court was confirmed in the Appeal and the present appeal is
pending
knowledge about the execution proceedings as well as the suit
proceedings. Therefore, the petitioners wantonly failed to appear before
the execution court and now come ... execution proceedings had arisen out of
judgment and decree passed in OS.No.339 of 1973 for ejectment as well
as claiming rental arrears
filed execution petition in E.P. No.3550 of
1993 as against one Mr.Syed Akbar, based on the judgment and decree for
ejectment made ... Obstructors preferred A.S. No.272 of 2002. The order of
the execution Court was confirmed in the Appeal and the present appeal is
pending
occupation. Therefore, the
respondent had to file the suit for ejectment, arrears of rent and for future
damages. As the deceased did not appear despite ... they were not aware of the suit filed by the
respondent for ejectment for damages and to their knowledge, no summons was
served
renumbered as OS.No.1234/1997. The suit was for
ejectment of defendants from the suit property and for recovery of
rent and for recovery ... plaintiff filed EP.No.17/2005 before the
District Munsif, Tiruvottiyur. The Execution Court ordered
delivery on 07.02.2006. When the Amin went to deliver
application directly to the
respondent through his counsel appearned in the Execution Proceedings within a
period of four weeks from the date of receipt ... court. Considering the fact that the suit has been filed for
ejectment and the long pendency of the same, in the event the petitioners
herein as plaintiff, filed the suit in OS.No.186/2012
for ejectment of the defendant/revision petitioner from the property
and for consequential reliefs ... papers
and the Sale Deed was also presented for registration after due
execution and the defendant after signing the document of sale,
refused to appear
