sharer obtained a decree for partition, the tenant can be ejected in execution. The lessee cannot contend that he is the tenant of the whole ... land by virtue of the lease deed and is thus protected against ejectment. A tenant let on the land by one of the co-sharers
learned counsel, the plaintiffs could not be ejected from the shop in dispute in the execution proceedings and the provisions of the East Punjab Urban ... sharer obtains a decree for partition, the tenant can be ejected in execution. The lessee cannot contend that he is the tenant of the whole
landlord filed application for ejectment against P.L. Chopra tenant under Section 13 of the Act whereby he sought his ejectment from the entire ... possession of one room from Sat Pal in the execution of ejectment order which had been obtained by his predecessor in title against
ejectment. Therefore, the ejectment order dated 7.6.1990 is a nullity being an order without jurisdiction and the same cannot be implemented by way of execution ... petitioner that for implementing an ejectment order passed by the Assistant Collector 1st Grade, execution application has to be filed and that too within
admitted the due execution of the compromised deed. On the basis of the compromise, the Rent Controller passed order of ejectment. In the compromise deed ... part of the Objectors to obstruct the execution proceedings. It has been further held that the ejectment order dated 25.7.1998 has been passed
Annexure P1 passed by the Assistant Colletor First Grade, Namaul directing the ejectment of the petitioner and order dated 17.4.1984 passed by the Collector, Narnaul ... execution application on the ground that the decree had not been complied with and (herefore, the petitioner was liable to be ejected. This application
Hemant Gupta, J.
1. The present petition is by the landlord seeking ejectment of the tenant on the ground that tenant has changed the user ... lease were reduced into memo dated 30.10.199. The petitioner has sought ejectment on the ground of arrears of rent, change of user as well
alleged to be" in paragraphs 3 and 6 of the ejectment application by assigning the following reasons:-
"After hearing the parties and going ... another document wherein the same admission has been recorded. This is the execution petition No.378 decided on 4.2.1937. The respondents produced copy of this
that the said additions and alterations had been made prior to the execution of the tenancy in his favour and, therefore, he could ... tenant was executed about 20/25 years before the filing of the ejectment application. There being no evidence to the contrary, the Rent Controller arrived
deem fit and in accordance with such procedure as may be prescribed, eject any person who is in wrongful or unauthorised possession of the land ... exercise the powers of a Revenue Court in relation to the execution of a decree under the Punjab Tenancy Act, 1887 :
Provided that
