attach that importance to the decree for ejectment and the. execution proceedings consequent upon it, which' it was his bouiiden duty
hereinafter referred to as 'the Tenancy Act ') for the ejectment of the third respondent on the ground that he was a trespasser ... petitioner obtained a decree, and thereafter in execution of his decree he recovered possession of the plot. The third respondent appealed, but before his appeal
District Magistrate took proceedings for ejectment as required under Section 11 of the said Act. To that execution objection was taken under Section 47, Civil
came to the conclusion that the execution of lease by Mohammadi Begum in favour of the petitioners had not been proved, he declared that ... unauthorised and passed an order on 7-3-1951 for the ejectment of the petitioners from the plot in dispute, which is numbered as plot
State vs Sm. Tugla on 10 February, 1955
Equivalent citations: AIR1955ALL423, 1955CRILJ1111, AIR 1955 ALLAHABAD
Sehat Ali Khan And Anr. vs Abdul Qavi Khan And Ors. on 28 November, 1955
Barhu Singh And Ors. vs Kharpattu And Ors. on 30 November, 1955
Equivalent citations: AIR1956ALL436
Kishan Singh vs Board Of Revenue, U.P. At Allahabad And ... on 29 April, 1955
Jagjit Singh vs District Magistrate, Kanpur And Ors. on 21 December, 1955
Equivalent citations: AIR1956ALL486
Mst. Sarojini Devi vs Rent Control And Eviction Officer, ... on 18 August, 1955
Equivalent citations