rent and ejectment against the respondent No. 3, (defendant in the suit). The aforesaid suit was decreed for arrears of rent and ejectment ... shall not be liable for ejectment. The respondent No. 3 filed objection against the compromise decree and its execution, which was rejected by the executing
that suit was filed by Asia Khatoon and others for ejectment of the plaintiff from the suit house on the ground of default ... months an execution case being Title Execution case No. 3/ 86 was filed and in execution of that decree the respondent was ejected from
tenancy, applicant No. 1 filed Regular Civil Suit No. 122/1986 for ejectment, possession and other reliefs. The suit was decreed ... affect the rights of the decree holder to eject the lessees and sub-lessees by initiating execution proceedings. The second objection which was raised
such application or suit or for the execution of an order or decree for ejectment of a Bharatia, the period from the 19th
decree and also further not entitled to ask for a stay of execution of a decree and further reliefs claimed in the notice ... events it will be appropriate to point out that after the purported execution of the ex parte decree, the respondents-landlords filed a suit
from the authorities concerned, execution of regular sale deed has been delayed and by reason of non-execution of regular sale deed, the title ... tenant by reason of non-execution of a regular sale deed.
12. I am, therefore, of the opinion that ejectment of the decree cannot
Annexure P1 passed by the Assistant Colletor First Grade, Namaul directing the ejectment of the petitioner and order dated 17.4.1984 passed by the Collector, Narnaul ... execution application on the ground that the decree had not been complied with and (herefore, the petitioner was liable to be ejected. This application
effect of, the contractual attornment. Title of the assignee is
complete on execution of the deed of assignment and is not postponed
till the notice ... right on the transferee.
The Division Bench held that the right of ejectment is inherent in
ownership. Therefore, by virtue of Section
issues were confirmed. Ultimately on 19.12.1977 both the suits were decreed for ejectment of the State of U. P. and for recovery of arrears ... this Court. Since there was no stay order staying the execution of the decrees, the decree holders filed Execution Case
whom ejectment decrees have already been obtained by the Peedathipathi in O. S.7 to 10 of 1982. In order to prevent the execution proceedings
