Search Results Page

Search Results

131 - 140 of 523 (0.41 seconds)

Surinder Katoch vs Vijay Kumar & Anr on 24 February, 2016

which are filed against the concurrent orders of the Courts below allowing ejectment of the petitioner-tenant from the demised premises. ASHISH Notice of motion ... vacate the premises voluntarily without forcing the respondents to press the execution petition. Learned counsel for the respondents has accepted the plea of reasonable time
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Raksha Devi vs Urmila Devi & Anr on 24 February, 2016

been filed against the concurrent orders of the Courts below allowing ejectment of the petitioner-tenant from the demised premises. On 03.02.2016 the following order ... would vacate the premises voluntarily without forcing the landlord to take out execution proceedings. I find this to be a fair submission. ASHISH
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Umesh Chander vs Raj Karwal on 28 March, 2016

been filed against the concurrent orders of the Courts below allowing ejectment of the petitioner-tenant from the demised premises. After arguing for some time ... vacate the premises voluntarily without forcing the respondent-landlord to press the execution petition. 1 of 2 ::: Downloaded
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Munish Kumar vs Sewa Singh on 17 May, 2016

been filed against the concurrent orders of the Courts below allowing ejectment of the petitioner-tenant from the demised premises. On 25.04.2016 the following order ... vacate the said premises voluntarily without forcing the respondent to press the execution in case reasonable time is granted for the same. I find this
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ashok Kumar vs Amrit Lal on 23 February, 2016

been filed against the concurrent orders of the Courts below allowing ejectment of the petitioner-tenant from the demised premises. Today on instructions from ... premises voluntarily by 31.03.2017 without forcing the respondent to press the execution petition and will continue to pay the rent in advance
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Kirpal Singh vs Tara Singh on 15 February, 2016

been filed against the concurrent orders of the Courts below allowing ejectment of the petitioner-tenant from the demised premises. Today on instructions from ... voluntarily on or before 31.01.2017 without forcing the respondent to file an execution petition and will continue to pay the rent in advance
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Kanwar Bhan vs Ramesh Kumar on 30 March, 2016

concurrent orders of the Courts below allowing ejectment of the petitioner-tenant from the demised premises. On 03.03.2016 the following order was passed:- "After ... vacate the premises voluntarily without forcing the respondent to press the execution. I find this to be a fair submission. Notice of the petitions
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Lakhwinder Singh vs Balwinder Singh on 4 May, 2016

Oral) This revision has been filed against the order dated 20.02.2016 allowing ejectment of the petitioner-tenant from the demised premises. After arguing for some ... vacate the said premises voluntarily without forcing the respondent to press the execution in case reasonable time is granted for 1 of 2 ::: Downloaded
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Seema Juneja vs Mohan Lal & Anr on 11 April, 2016

been filed against the concurrent orders of the Courts below allowing ejectment of the petitioner-tenant from the demised premises. On 31.03.2016 the following order ... said demised premises voluntarily without forcing the respondents to press the execution in case reasonable time is granted for the same. I find this
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
Previous   10 11 12 13 14   15 16 17 18 19 Next