ejectment by wrongly mentioning that the
execution of order dated 05.01.1984 was still pending on the ground of
arrears of rent for the purpose ... previous ejectment proceeding passed on
05.01.1984, the petitioners did not deposit the arrears of rent compelling the
respondents to file the execution application
decree
of ejecting the petitioner from the land in question, except in due course of
law. Respondents were constrained to file an execution application
Aakash Gupta, legal representative of
Ravinder Nath Gupta filed an ejectment petition and the ejectment was
ordered by the Assistant Collector Ist Grade ... some false plea. The aforementioned execution was objected by the
petitioner on the various grounds including the maintainability of execution
application, much less being time
tenancy has been sublet, the tenant
shall be liable to be ejected only from such part, or
(vii) refuses to execute a Qabuliyat ... within a period of two months from the date of notice of
execution of decree or order, directing him to pay such arrears
of rent
Shamsher Singh vs The District Magistrate Union ... on 20 February, 2017
Author: Amit Rawal
Bench
stated that the State of Haryana
was not a party to the ejectment proceedings. Therefore, the
order dated 03.12.2009 passed by the Assistant Collector ... interest of justice. In
addition, I am of the opinion that execution of order dated
03.12.2009 may cause irreparable loss to the State. The
impugned
