holder. No ejectment order has been passed against him and therefore, decree holder has no right to eject him by way of execution ... their own act or conduct. Such a tenant can be ejected in execution of partition decree obtained against the co-sharer
earlier point of time, ejectment proceedings were initiated against the
petitioner, under Section 7 of the Act wherein, his ejectment was ordered
and those proceedings ... have become final. It appears that with a view to
delay execution of ejectment order, this writ petition was filed.
No case is made
filed in
execution proceedings was rejected by the Commissioner on the ground
that she was not a party to the original ejectment order dated ... execution proceedings as admittedly she was never a party in the
eviction proceedings and the Executing Court was merely to comply
with the ejectment order
that the
petitioners were not party in the ejectment proceedings and there is no
order of ejectment against them.
Further prayer of the petitioners ... issue directions to the
official respondents not to eject them from Khasra No.325 being owner in
possession, except by due process
possession of the land in dispute, filed an application for execution of the ejectment order passed in the year 1996 and the Assistant Collector vide
Gram
Panchayat-respondent no. 7, petitioner was ordered to be ejected from 1 marla of
land falling in Khasra No. 658. Appeal filed ... petitioner be ejected from the
land qua which ejectment order has been passed. Petitioner and Gram Panchayat
filed applications stating that the execution proceedings
Jasbir Singh, J. (Oral)
It is grievance of the petitioner that despite ejectment order
having been passed against respondent Nos.5 to 8, ordering them ... time of arguments, it transpires that in terms of ejectment
order dated 27.3.1995, execution application is pending before the District
Revenue Officer-cum-Collector, Sonepat
marlas of land. Gram Panchayat filed an application against
him for ejectment under Section 7 of the Punjab Village Common Lands
(Regulation ... unauthorized occupation of the land in dispute. Gram Panchayat filed an
execution application, which was allowed on 03.03.2008. Petitioner was
directed to vacate the land
Respondent No.4 filed a petition against the appellant for
his ejectment to the extent of 103/879 share out of 44 Kanals 09
Marlas ... order dated 22.4.2002 ejectment was ordered. That
order has become final. The respondent No.4, thereafter filed an
application for execution, however, it was dismissed
Singh, Judge (Oral)
It is stated by the petitioner that despite an ejectment order
dated 11.5.2007 (Annexure P1), having become final against the private
respondents ... action to eject them from that land.
Perusal of paper book indicates that in terms of order dated
11.5.2007, an execution application was filed, which
