Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 33 (0.54 seconds)

Jatinderpal Singh vs Jagdeep Singh on 23 July, 2010

This observation is factually incorrect because even ex parte ejectment order, in execution whereof the plaintiff was dispossessed, was passed on 02.08.1999 and, therefore ... possession of the disputed shop from the defendant because the ejectment order in execution whereof the defendant had taken possession of the disputed shop
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - L N Mittal - Full Document

Mahesh Kumar vs Jaishi Ram Goyal on 17 November, 2010

legal representative. Respondent-decree holder filed execution petition in the year 2003 for execution of the ejectment order. Petitioner preferred objections in the execution petition ... demised property pursuant to ejectment order and therefore, petitioner is not liable to be ejected from the demised property in execution of the ejectment order
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - L N Mittal - Full Document

Raj Kumar vs Smt. Kamlesh And Others on 19 July, 2012

agreement dated 07.02.2006. However, in spite thereof, the defendants filed execution petition for executing ejectment order (Annexure P-1). The plaintiff sought temporary injunction restraining ... find no ground to grant temporary injunction to the plaintiff against execution of ejectment order passed by the Rent Controller. Plaintiff has failed to make
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - L N Mittal - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next