Badala was an old tenant as she had not been ejected in execution of the decree for ejectment obtained by the plaintiff on 2nd June ... that there is no evidence that Mt. Badala respondent was actually ejected in execution of the decree. Although she remained in possession after the passing
Kali Devi against the appellant, Pandit Niranjan Lal Bhargava, for his ejectment from a building, known as "Sahu Palace". The aforesaid premises were ... decree, but that the matter, whether the defendant could be actually ejected in execution of the decree, should be considered at the time when
appellant made an application to the execution Court for the execution of the decree for ejectment against the respondent. That Court, however, took the view ... accordingly dismissed the execution application. The appellant went up in appeal from this order of the execution Court. The order of the execution Court was passed
held that he was lawfully ejected, he did not know of the ejectment proceedings. The rule referred to by the learned Counsel has been framed ... follows:
79. Delivery of possession in execution of a decree or Order for ejectment shall be made by the qurq amia who, on his arrival
held that ho was lawfully ejected, he did not know of the ejectment proceedings. The rule referred to by the learned Counsel has been framed ... follows:
79. Delivery of possession in execution of a decree or order for ejectment shall be made by the qurq amin who, on his arrival
Chabutra and the Nali be decreed."
The decree-holder applied for execution of this decree. On notice being issued to the judgment-debtor objection ... facts were that a suit for ejectment was instituted in a revenue Court. It ended in a compromise according to which the plaintiffs were
Deep Chandra vs Ruknuddaula Shamsher Jang Nawab ... on 11 May, 1949
Equivalent citations: AIR1951ALL93, AIR
