ejectment passed by
the Court of Small Causes. The decree came to be
challenged by civil revision application where the
High Court stayed the execution
work of a
permanent character, and has incurred expenses in its
execution.
16. The submission of Sri Arvind Vashistha, learned
Senior Counsel appearing on behalf ... Easement Act; and the respondents are therefore not entitled to
eject them from the subject premises. We must express our
inability to agree
Surender Kumar And Others vs State Of Haryana And Others on 14 March, 2019
Author
A. Radhakrishnan vs The Chief Electoral Officer on 2 April, 2019
Equivalent citations: AIRONLINE 2019
Smt. Usha Rani Gupta And 4 Others vs State Of U P Through The Chief
Desetty.Varahalamma vs The District Legal Services Authority, on 6 August, 2019
Author: M. Satyanarayana
Ram Singh And Ors vs State Of Haryana And Ors on 14 March, 2019
Author
Ram Chander And Others vs State Of Haryana And Others on 14 March, 2019
Author
Raj Kumar And Others vs State Of Haryana And Others on 14 March, 2019
Author
Surender Kumar And Others vs State Of Haryana And Others on 14 March, 2019
Author