kept with the
record.
The decree passed in the ejectment suit being Ejectment
Suit No. 39 of 2005 by the 2nd Court of learned Civil ... District 24 Parganas (South) was
put into execution giving rise to Ejectment Execution Case
No. 10 of 2016.
The petitioner in the said execution case
proceeding in Misc. Case of 27 of 2021
arising out of Ejectment Execution Case No. 37 of 2016,
passed the Judge, 4th Bench, Presidency Small ... executing a Registered Deed on
14.03.2002. However, the opposite party filed an
Ejectment Suit being no. 319 of 2014 and obtained a
ex-parte decree
June 10, 2009. The said decree was put into
execution giving rise to Execution Case No. 59 of
2009 before the learned Judge, 5th Bench ... decree passed in Ejectment Suit No.
784 of 2000 on June 10, 2009 and from
further proceeding with the Ejectment
Execution;
(d) Pass an order
opposite parties
Being aggrieved by the interim order of stay of
Ejectment Execution Case No. 140 of 2016 for a period
of three weeks ... eviction
against the defendant firm on 08.09.2016 and filed an
Ejectment execution case being no.140 of 2016. Then
2
troubles started for plaintiffs
Bench, in Misc. Case No. 18 of 2017 arising
out of Ejectment Execution Case No. 140 of 2016 on
17.11.2021 has preferred the present revisional
passed in Ejectment Suit No. 23 of
2006 by Civil Judge (Junior Division), 5th Court, Alipore
on 12.03.2019 and in Ejectment Execution Case
Civil Judge(Junior Division) at Sealdah,
District 24-Parganas (South) in Ejectment
Execution case no. 06 of 2019.
The opposite party has challenged the
appellate
under
order 21 rule 97 Civil Procedure Code arising out of
Ejectment Execution Case No. 203 of 2004 on 01.10.19
and has preferred the present
opposite parties in spite
of service.
The suit for ejectment being Ejectment Suit No. 495 of
2012 filed by the father of the petitioners ... said decree when was put into execution gives rise
to Ejectment Execution Case No. 117 of 2017 before the
learned 4th Judge, Small Causes Court
along with all connected
applications, arising out of Ejectment Execution
Case No.68 of 2014 pending in the said court as
expeditiously as possible, positively
