others and the Applicant put the said
decree to execution through Ejectment Execution No. 10 of 2016
and also filed Miscellaneous Case ... Ejectment Suit No. 39
9
of 2005. There is also a reference to the Miscellaneous Case No. 208
of 2017 for execution of a decree
taken from them in execution of the warrant of possession issued in
execution of ejectment order passed against them.
8. DC, Kapurthala is directed
Aruna Tiwari, Raipur vs Principal Commissioner Of Income ... on 18 July, 2023
आयकर अपील य
sought
to be enforced or relied upon, even at the stage of execution and even
in collateral proceedings. A defect of jurisdiction, whether ... appellant in
execution. It is already held that it is the Controller under the Act that
has exclusive jurisdiction to order ejectment of a tenant
sought to
be enforced or relied upon, even at the stage of execution and
even in collateral proceedings. A defect of jurisdiction, whether ... appellant in execution. It is already held that it is the
Controller under the Act that has exclusive jurisdiction to order
ejectment of a tenant
sought to
be enforced or relied upon, even at the stage of execution and
even in collateral proceedings. A defect of jurisdiction, whether ... appellant in execution. It is already held that it
is the Controller under the Act that has exclusive jurisdiction to
order ejectment of a tenant
sought to be enforced
or relied upon, even at the stage of execution and even in collateral
proceedings. A defect of jurisdiction, whether ... appellant in execution. It is already held that it is the Controller
under the Act that has exclusive jurisdiction to order ejectment of a
tenant
sought to be enforced
or relied upon, even at the stage of execution and even in collateral
proceedings. A defect of jurisdiction, whether ... appellant in execution. It is already held that it is the Controller
under the Act that has exclusive jurisdiction to order ejectment of a
tenant
sought to be enforced or relied
upon, even at the stage of execution and even in collateral
proceedings. A defect of jurisdiction, whether ... appellant in execution. It is already held that it is the Controller under
the Act that has exclusive jurisdiction to order ejectment of a tenant
sought to be enforced or relied
upon, even at the stage of execution and even in collateral
proceedings. A defect of jurisdiction, whether ... appellant in execution. It is already held that it is the Controller under
the Act that has exclusive jurisdiction to order ejectment of a tenant
